1. Caffrey, et al, Journal of Biomechanics, 49 (2016) 4090-4097.
  2. Ganey, Journal of the Spinal Research Foundation, 8 (2013) 45-48.
  3. Xin, et al, Titanium Implants Manufactured with Proprietary 3D-Printing Build Themes Contain Surface Features that Increase Biologic Activity, SMISS 2019.
  4. Collino, et al, Subsidence of Additively-Manufactured Cages in Foam Substrates: Effect on Contact Topology, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Sep 2020;142(9):091003.
  5. Kiapour, et al, Comparison of a 3D printed truss-based lateral interbody device to an annular lateral interbody device for resistance to subsidence: a cadaveric study, The Spine Journal. 20. DOI: 10.1016/J.Spinee.2020.05.597. 
  6. Kiapour, et al, Effect of end plate contact surface topology and structural modulus on subsidence: comparison of two 3D-printed titanium lateral interbody devices The Spine Journal. 20. DOI: 10.1016/J.Spinee.2020.05.595. 
  7. Kiapour A., Vijay G, Ferrara L, Hunt J. Subsidence evaluation of 4-WEB, a novel cross strut based, interbody cage design. International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine (ISSLS); Gothenburg, Sweden. 2011.
  8. Kiapour A., Kumar M., MSc; Kelkar A., Goel V. A Titanium Additive Manufactured Lateral Interbody Device with Truss Endplate Design Has Significantly Better Subsidence Resistance Compared to a Generic Annular Interbody Device AANS 2020.
  9. Kiapour A., et al. Bone Mineralization and Spinal Fusion Evaluation of a Truss-based Interbody Fusion Device. Spine Vol. 47, Number 7, pp E319-E327. 2021.